Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 5194 for ey.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 5194 for ey.
State v. Nathaniel Crampton
just after the incident; Ulysses Turner, the only “eye-witness” who did identify Crampton, made his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31
just after the incident; Ulysses Turner, the only “eye-witness” who did identify Crampton, made his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Rutzinski
this stop, Officer Sardina observed that Rutzinski, the driver of the pickup, had glassy, bloodshot eyes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17464 - 2005-03-31
this stop, Officer Sardina observed that Rutzinski, the driver of the pickup, had glassy, bloodshot eyes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17464 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald D. Marshall
eyes were red and glassy. Marshall soon admitted that he had consumed about “three beers or so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3998 - 2005-03-31
eyes were red and glassy. Marshall soon admitted that he had consumed about “three beers or so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Perry v. New Hampshire, 565 U.S. 228, 244 (2012) (stating that “[m]ost eye witness identifications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228767 - 2018-12-04
Perry v. New Hampshire, 565 U.S. 228, 244 (2012) (stating that “[m]ost eye witness identifications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228767 - 2018-12-04
State v. Vaughn Thurmond
is to magnify in the eyes of the jury any evidence which may have been adduced which is pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6082 - 2005-03-31
is to magnify in the eyes of the jury any evidence which may have been adduced which is pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2022AP1014 15 Flavor Development’s expert witness testified would show immediate burning of eyes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682413 - 2023-07-25
). No. 2022AP1014 15 Flavor Development’s expert witness testified would show immediate burning of eyes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682413 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Crampton
viewed just after the incident; Ulysses Turner, the only “eye-witness” who did identify Crampton, made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13383 - 2017-09-21
viewed just after the incident; Ulysses Turner, the only “eye-witness” who did identify Crampton, made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13383 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the subject “appeared very nervous. He was talking on his cell phone. Appeared to be—eyes darting around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79052 - 2012-03-05
that the subject “appeared very nervous. He was talking on his cell phone. Appeared to be—eyes darting around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79052 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Vaughn Thurmond
depend is to magnify in the eyes of the jury any evidence which may have been adduced which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6082 - 2017-09-19
depend is to magnify in the eyes of the jury any evidence which may have been adduced which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 75
in anal intercourse with C.D. without her consent. C.D. hit Bell in the eye, causing him to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036811 - 2026-01-26
in anal intercourse with C.D. without her consent. C.D. hit Bell in the eye, causing him to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036811 - 2026-01-26