Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44901 - 44910 of 83846 for case number.
Search results 44901 - 44910 of 83846 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Jonothan Gils
appeal: 1) the trial judge did not have jurisdiction over his case; 2) the evidence No. 00-0180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2170 - 2017-09-19
appeal: 1) the trial judge did not have jurisdiction over his case; 2) the evidence No. 00-0180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2170 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bonnie L.K.
141, 143 (Ct. App. 1993). That case and others like it, however, involve a direct attack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10900 - 2005-03-31
141, 143 (Ct. App. 1993). That case and others like it, however, involve a direct attack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10900 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Denettria J.
: “In Marsaide’s case it is a little bit a [sic] closer call and a more difficult decision.” However, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20860 - 2017-09-21
: “In Marsaide’s case it is a little bit a [sic] closer call and a more difficult decision.” However, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20860 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 24
2022 WI APP 24 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2021AP765-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=506357 - 2022-06-08
2022 WI APP 24 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2021AP765-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=506357 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
in that case, in certain instances an estimation of speed will be so unreliable it will not be admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29612 - 2014-09-15
in that case, in certain instances an estimation of speed will be so unreliable it will not be admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
for termination of parental rights in this case, we reverse. Background ¶2 Richard F.B. and Debra S.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
for termination of parental rights in this case, we reverse. Background ¶2 Richard F.B. and Debra S.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 25
2021 WI APP 25 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP791
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348639 - 2021-05-10
2021 WI APP 25 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP791
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348639 - 2021-05-10
State v. Stephen C.
. At the September hearing, the case was scheduled for a contested fact-finding hearing on February 10, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7649 - 2005-03-31
. At the September hearing, the case was scheduled for a contested fact-finding hearing on February 10, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey E. Marotz v. Arthur E. Hallman, Jr.
of WIS. STAT. § 632.32(5)(i)1. (2003-04)1 and three Wisconsin Supreme Court cases, Dowhower v. West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20747 - 2017-09-21
of WIS. STAT. § 632.32(5)(i)1. (2003-04)1 and three Wisconsin Supreme Court cases, Dowhower v. West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20747 - 2017-09-21