Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44921 - 44930 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] Frank Musa v. Jefferson County Bank
further include charges for hospitalization, nursing care, diagnostic tests, medications, therapy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17435 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
assess claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under the two-prong test described in Strickland v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the “deliberate indifference” test, the government employee must be subjectively aware that the inmate faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082881 - 2026-02-27

Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
the balancing test found in Wis. Stat. § 19.97(3); and (3) the December 12 public hearing constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2481 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of East Troy v. A-1 Service Company
and 349.06, STATS., must be read together to establish one test—that municipal traffic ordinances must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8040 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for us to engage in the balancing test between the suspect’s personal characteristics and those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930174 - 2025-03-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and that, based on the tests conducted, there is “very strong support that [Ridley] is a contributor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606178 - 2022-12-29

Heather R. Nugent v. Charles A. Slaght
court’s general directive that appellate courts not apply discretionary tests in the circuit court’s stead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2638 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant has rebutted the presumption in favor of the judge’s impartiality, we generally apply two tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66071 - 2011-06-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
apply two tests, one subjective Nos. 2010AP2248 2010AP2249 15 and one objective. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66071 - 2014-09-15