Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44921 - 44930 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44921 - 44930 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110988 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Raymond T. Golden
not to do so. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9901 - 2017-09-19
not to do so. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9901 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104457 - 2017-09-21
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104457 - 2017-09-21
Dennis J. Arnold v. City of Milwaukee
. Appellate courts decide appeals based on the law and the facts that are revealed by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10352 - 2005-03-31
. Appellate courts decide appeals based on the law and the facts that are revealed by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10352 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97081 - 2013-05-16
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97081 - 2013-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007719 - 2025-09-11
independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007719 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
any potential mootness, we have conducted an independent review of the record. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744283 - 2023-12-27
any potential mootness, we have conducted an independent review of the record. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744283 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835070 - 2024-08-08
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835070 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an independent review of the record, this court determined that there were no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928504 - 2025-03-18
an independent review of the record, this court determined that there were no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928504 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2023AP1953-CRNM 2 review of the record, the no-merit report, the responses, and the supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887493 - 2024-12-12
2023AP1953-CRNM 2 review of the record, the no-merit report, the responses, and the supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887493 - 2024-12-12