Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 451 - 460 of 83436 for case code.

Circuit court eFiling - Opt-in troubleshooting for self-represented parties – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
on the case. This code is required when opting in. The pro se opt-in code is featured on the GF-180
/hc/en-us/articles/25360181765389-Circuit-court-eFiling-Opt-in-troubleshooting-for-self-represented-parties

Frank Geiger v. Eastern Wisconsin Stock Car Association
was in violation of statutes and administrative code sections governing standard weights and measures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14835 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frank Geiger v. Eastern Wisconsin Stock Car Association
. Geiger claimed that the EWSCA was in violation of statutes and administrative code sections governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14835 - 2017-09-21

[PDF]
with a Planned Development Overlay. ¶3 On May 26, 2017, the City sent Loren’s a code violation notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555332 - 2022-08-17

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decisions in case nos. 2008AP2897, 2009AP25-CR and 2009AP2845
July 14, 2011 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68114 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that he files a number of cases on behalf of tenants under the Wisconsin Administrative Code, often
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43497 - 2009-11-17

[PDF] NOTICE
of cases on behalf of tenants under the Wisconsin Administrative Code, often receiving referrals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43497 - 2014-09-15

Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View LTD Partnerships
. Adm. Code § ATCP 134.06 and § 100.20(5). The interpretation and application of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14948 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View LTD Partnerships
of WIS. ADM. CODE § ATCP 134.06 and § 100.20(5). The interpretation and application of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14948 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
”) now appeal, raising four arguments. First, Blakley argues that Landmark violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650754 - 2023-05-02