Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 451 - 460 of 68466 for did.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
moved to have the 2004 conviction excluded on the ground that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 802.05 (2005-06)[1] did not apply retroactively to this case and, if the new statute did apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05

COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24

COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor’s sentencing remarks did not breach the plea agreement, we affirm. ¶2 At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Because Chapman did not file and serve a proper summons on the defendants, the circuit court lacked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240543 - 2019-05-15

State v. Bryce C. Nelson
on the basis that Dacko did not have actual authority to consent to a search of his room and that Golden did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15752 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38611 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to seize her.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor’s sentencing remarks did not breach the plea agreement, we affirm. ¶2 At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103931 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
concluded the provisions of No. 2006AP2394 2 the new WIS. STAT. § 802.05 (2005-06)1 did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32016 - 2014-09-15