Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 16587 for h's.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 16587 for h's.
[PDF]
AP002443 CR State v. David G. Dudas
Department of Human Services v. N. H.-D. 2019AP002160 Racine County HSD v. S.J.A. 2019AP002161 Racine County
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256906 - 2020-03-25
Department of Human Services v. N. H.-D. 2019AP002160 Racine County HSD v. S.J.A. 2019AP002161 Racine County
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256906 - 2020-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.30(2)(h). A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel is convinced that further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912148 - 2025-02-05
809.30(2)(h). A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel is convinced that further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912148 - 2025-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h).2 A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel is convinced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037273 - 2025-11-10
under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h).2 A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel is convinced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037273 - 2025-11-10
State v. Larry R. Dowe
] State v. Dowe, 197 Wis. 2d 848, 541 N.W.2d 218 (1995) [2] Wis. Stat. § 161.41(1m)(h)1 (1991-92). [3] Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16989 - 2005-03-31
] State v. Dowe, 197 Wis. 2d 848, 541 N.W.2d 218 (1995) [2] Wis. Stat. § 161.41(1m)(h)1 (1991-92). [3] Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16989 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(h). Attorney Lamb now moves to dismiss the no-merit appeal and extend the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99416 - 2013-07-11
. Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(h). Attorney Lamb now moves to dismiss the no-merit appeal and extend the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99416 - 2013-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). In response to appellate counsel’s request, Vaughn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990293 - 2025-07-28
of a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). In response to appellate counsel’s request, Vaughn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990293 - 2025-07-28
[PDF]
Must a judge testify when subpoenaed?
of _________________, 1997. _________________________________ Thomas H. Barland Chair
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903 - 2017-09-20
of _________________, 1997. _________________________________ Thomas H. Barland Chair
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). In response to appellate counsel’s request, Vaughn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990293 - 2025-07-28
of a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). In response to appellate counsel’s request, Vaughn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990293 - 2025-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Larry R. Dowe
848, 541 N.W.2d 218 (1995) 2 Wis. Stat. § 161.41(1m)(h)1 (1991-92). 3 Wis. Stat. § 139.95(2) (1991
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16989 - 2017-09-21
848, 541 N.W.2d 218 (1995) 2 Wis. Stat. § 161.41(1m)(h)1 (1991-92). 3 Wis. Stat. § 139.95(2) (1991
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16989 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David E.Z. Sims
not file a timely motion under § 974.02, STATS., and RULE 809.30(2)(h), STATS. Consequently, he lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9416 - 2017-09-19
not file a timely motion under § 974.02, STATS., and RULE 809.30(2)(h), STATS. Consequently, he lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9416 - 2017-09-19