Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 12336 for o's.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 12336 for o's.
State v. John Robert John
(13)(c)1 specifies that the court may, “[o]rder restitution of amounts not in dispute as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3315 - 2005-03-31
(13)(c)1 specifies that the court may, “[o]rder restitution of amounts not in dispute as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nicholas S. Cole
. The trial court summarily denied the motion because “[n]o transcript of the plea hearing was ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05
. The trial court summarily denied the motion because “[n]o transcript of the plea hearing was ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05
[PDF]
�
Kiefer Law Office LLC P. O. Box 1546 Madison, WI 53701-1546 Robert Probst Assistant Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95486 - 2014-09-15
Kiefer Law Office LLC P. O. Box 1546 Madison, WI 53701-1546 Robert Probst Assistant Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95486 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas S. Cole
his trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court summarily denied the motion because “[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21
his trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court summarily denied the motion because “[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with each other.” The court also explained its public policy reasoning: [O]n balance we want the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2011-12-18
with each other.” The court also explained its public policy reasoning: [O]n balance we want the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2011-12-18
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
into the record nor clearly stated,” “[t]here was no plea c[o]lloquy conducted in this case period,” and “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-05-02
into the record nor clearly stated,” “[t]here was no plea c[o]lloquy conducted in this case period,” and “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-05-02
CA Blank Order
Courthouse 215 South Hamilton, Rm. 1000 Madison, WI 53703 Farheen M. Ansari AF Law P. O. Box 8822 Madison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112550 - 2014-05-20
Courthouse 215 South Hamilton, Rm. 1000 Madison, WI 53703 Farheen M. Ansari AF Law P. O. Box 8822 Madison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112550 - 2014-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the public. The court stated, “[T]o call this an outrage or to say that it is horrific or brutal or savage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174942 - 2017-09-21
the public. The court stated, “[T]o call this an outrage or to say that it is horrific or brutal or savage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174942 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Penny L. Swanson
to deliver and renews her challenge to the warrant on appeal. Section 968.22, STATS., provides that "[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
to deliver and renews her challenge to the warrant on appeal. Section 968.22, STATS., provides that "[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Farheen M. Ansari AF Law P. O. Box 8822 Madison, WI 53708-8822 Lisa A. Riniker District Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98494 - 2014-09-15
Farheen M. Ansari AF Law P. O. Box 8822 Madison, WI 53708-8822 Lisa A. Riniker District Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98494 - 2014-09-15