Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 63485 for records.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191960 - 2017-09-21
of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191960 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, counsel’s supplemental no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
, counsel’s supplemental no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not respond. This court has considered the no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
not respond. This court has considered the no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
State v. Vincent C. Lewis
armed” enhancer of the homicide; (4) failing to request criminal records of the State’s witnesses; (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5598 - 2005-03-31
armed” enhancer of the homicide; (4) failing to request criminal records of the State’s witnesses; (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 merit report. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Howell’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
2 merit report. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Howell’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record and based on a false premise because, while the sewer main was public property, the sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
by the record and based on a false premise because, while the sewer main was public property, the sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 4
record. We agree with Palmer and LIRC that based upon the particular facts of this case, Cree failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311702 - 2021-02-08
record. We agree with Palmer and LIRC that based upon the particular facts of this case, Cree failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311702 - 2021-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record conclusively demonstrates that Packer was not entitled to withdraw his pleas. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
the record conclusively demonstrates that Packer was not entitled to withdraw his pleas. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
through. Finally, the Town asked that Count 3 be dismissed because it was an “open records” request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15
through. Finally, the Town asked that Count 3 be dismissed because it was an “open records” request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15