Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 12799 for se.
Search results 4501 - 4510 of 12799 for se.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Russell O. Rose1 appeals pro se from two circuit court orders dismissing his Motions to Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048748 - 2025-12-10
. Russell O. Rose1 appeals pro se from two circuit court orders dismissing his Motions to Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048748 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
William O. Marquis v. St. Mary's Hospital of Milwaukee
, Schudson and Curley, JJ. PER CURIAM. Attorney William O. Marquis, pro se, father of and as guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10696 - 2017-09-20
, Schudson and Curley, JJ. PER CURIAM. Attorney William O. Marquis, pro se, father of and as guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10696 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Friso, pro se, appeals from a judgment dismissing his small claims Complaint against Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
. Friso, pro se, appeals from a judgment dismissing his small claims Complaint against Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
the special assessments, the front-foot method, was per se reasonable. The Genrichs appeal. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6233 - 2005-03-31
the special assessments, the front-foot method, was per se reasonable. The Genrichs appeal. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Precious M. Ward, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108920 - 2017-09-21
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Precious M. Ward, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. Rule 809.23(3). Robert J. Hutchinson, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332728 - 2021-02-09
in WIS. STAT. Rule 809.23(3). Robert J. Hutchinson, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332728 - 2021-02-09
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael O’Grady, pro se, appeals a judgment of $427.72 granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael O’Grady, pro se, appeals a judgment of $427.72 granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
State v. Sylvester Townsend
, pro se, from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. He raises seven issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18515 - 2005-06-13
, pro se, from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. He raises seven issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18515 - 2005-06-13
Order-SC
year after the decision in the unsuccessful appeal, Starks, acting pro se, filed a Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118156 - 2015-01-20
year after the decision in the unsuccessful appeal, Starks, acting pro se, filed a Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118156 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
WI APP 58
and Eric L. Fankhauser, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48535 - 2014-09-15
and Eric L. Fankhauser, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48535 - 2014-09-15