Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45021 - 45030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 45021 - 45030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probation was revoked in another case despite the sentencing court relying on a representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218119 - 2018-08-28
probation was revoked in another case despite the sentencing court relying on a representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218119 - 2018-08-28
[PDF]
WI APP 14
2010 WI APP 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On the night of the events giving rise to this case, Deal, Ahyoh Cowans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71073 - 2014-09-15
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On the night of the events giving rise to this case, Deal, Ahyoh Cowans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Paul Wozniak
analysis he used in this case. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1995, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
analysis he used in this case. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1995, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. Id. See also State v. Shillcutt, 116 Wis. 2d 227, 236, 341 N.W.2d 716 (Ct. App. 1983), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30053 - 2007-08-21
of the case. Id. See also State v. Shillcutt, 116 Wis. 2d 227, 236, 341 N.W.2d 716 (Ct. App. 1983), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30053 - 2007-08-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2018 WI 42 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2529-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211556 - 2018-04-20
2018 WI 42 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2529-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211556 - 2018-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
or sentencing modification. The plea agreement in this case required the State to “cap” its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
or sentencing modification. The plea agreement in this case required the State to “cap” its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“that the [trial] court correctly held that the new evidence was not relevant to Curtis’s case and was not likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
“that the [trial] court correctly held that the new evidence was not relevant to Curtis’s case and was not likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wilfred E. Tobias
Case No.: 95-0324-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19
Case No.: 95-0324-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven J. Sattler v. Elliot G. Goldin, M.D.
of the marriage, and therefore is not permitted under Wisconsin law. We affirm. BACKGROUND Since this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12910 - 2017-09-21
of the marriage, and therefore is not permitted under Wisconsin law. We affirm. BACKGROUND Since this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12910 - 2017-09-21