Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45021 - 45030 of 84400 for case number.

[PDF] NOTICE
first attempt to obtain the land in dispute in this case ended when the Town abandoned its condemnation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28611 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in this case because the court there concluded that the statute was facially valid, while he is arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in dismissing her action pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 805.03. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has a long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239891 - 2019-04-30

State v. Christopher L. Combs
. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed person
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14

[PDF] State v. David E. Verhagen
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8205 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8317 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, we determined that it was not necessary to separate the case into two separate appeals. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98614 - 2014-09-15

Town of Delavan v. Candice H. Suriano
to the Town.[1] FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶3 The procedural history of this case is crucial to our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4438 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Brandt
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1489-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert H. Roth
he is entitled to a new trial because the case was not fully tried. We disagree with this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6979 - 2005-03-31