Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45031 - 45040 of 68502 for did.
Search results 45031 - 45040 of 68502 for did.
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
and that the landowner did not consider it open to the public for any reason. The landowner submitted no affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
and that the landowner did not consider it open to the public for any reason. The landowner submitted no affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Zois Dertis v. Dimitrios Panagiotaras
as a shareholder’s derivative action. Panagiotaras responds that Dertis did not make this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4295 - 2017-09-19
as a shareholder’s derivative action. Panagiotaras responds that Dertis did not make this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4295 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The sentencing court considered appropriate factors, did not consider improper factors, and reached
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
). The sentencing court considered appropriate factors, did not consider improper factors, and reached
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 postconviction relief. Williams claims: (1) the police did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92189 - 2014-09-15
2 postconviction relief. Williams claims: (1) the police did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92189 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 503. ¶8 Jackson details all of the evidence the State did not present against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41869 - 2009-10-05
. at 503. ¶8 Jackson details all of the evidence the State did not present against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41869 - 2009-10-05
CA Blank Order
and a baggie. As appellate counsel points out, however, the defense did not challenge the amount of cocaine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105608 - 2013-12-10
and a baggie. As appellate counsel points out, however, the defense did not challenge the amount of cocaine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105608 - 2013-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to the lawfulness of the initial stop. First, Moore argues Brown did not have reasonable suspicion to initiate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38346 - 2009-07-27
to the lawfulness of the initial stop. First, Moore argues Brown did not have reasonable suspicion to initiate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38346 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision. Burks did not file a direct appeal. In January 2021, Burks filed a pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574347 - 2022-10-12
’ extended supervision. Burks did not file a direct appeal. In January 2021, Burks filed a pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574347 - 2022-10-12
State v. Vito George Ambrosia
court suppressed did not specifically reference the original pre-Miranda interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10076 - 2005-03-31
court suppressed did not specifically reference the original pre-Miranda interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Rocha’s trial counsel did not challenge the statement; (5) neither the D.A. nor the circuit court judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069321 - 2026-01-27
, and Rocha’s trial counsel did not challenge the statement; (5) neither the D.A. nor the circuit court judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069321 - 2026-01-27