Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45041 - 45050 of 69114 for he.
Search results 45041 - 45050 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the admission of evidence that he had previously engaged in homosexual sexual activity with a third party who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257546 - 2020-04-09
the admission of evidence that he had previously engaged in homosexual sexual activity with a third party who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257546 - 2020-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and he has responded. Counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
, and he has responded. Counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Murrell. In the stipulation, Attorney Murrell acknowledges that he suffers from a medical incapacity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695177 - 2023-08-23
Murrell. In the stipulation, Attorney Murrell acknowledges that he suffers from a medical incapacity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695177 - 2023-08-23
CA Blank Order
against Lane arose from a police raid of a known drug house where he was residing with several other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
against Lane arose from a police raid of a known drug house where he was residing with several other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
State v. Lee Anton Jackson
term of probation. Subsequently, the State revoked Jackson’s probation and he returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10749 - 2005-03-31
term of probation. Subsequently, the State revoked Jackson’s probation and he returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10749 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Burba
with intent to deliver.[1] Burba contends he is entitled to resentencing because the initial sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5281 - 2005-03-31
with intent to deliver.[1] Burba contends he is entitled to resentencing because the initial sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not respond. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263732 - 2020-06-09
a response, but he did not respond. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263732 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In his postconviction motion, Moua contended that trial counsel was ineffective because he “failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30274 - 2014-09-15
. In his postconviction motion, Moua contended that trial counsel was ineffective because he “failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. He argues that the disparity between his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155957 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. He argues that the disparity between his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Miles J. Laumann
him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14611 - 2017-09-21
him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14611 - 2017-09-21