Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45051 - 45060 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.

State v. Christopher Gammons
. This finding was not clearly erroneous because it is supported by evidence in the record. See State v. Hampton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2247 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John E. Kehler
than Kehler's. Because there is credible evidence in the record to support that finding, we accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10592 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
decision on the reimbursement issue. In May of 1995, Edna stipulated on the record that all legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had “a couple of beers” in the afternoon. The record suggests Haizel had more beer that evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103615 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert D. Hanson
record and contacts, his prior violent episodes with the victim and another woman, and the minimizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15001 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief on either claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248649 - 2019-10-16

State v. David D. Masini
. The record shows that the court took Rogness’ answer to mean that he would try to be fair and impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13181 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Nathaniel. The interviews were on the record, but the children were not sworn in. The court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54839 - 2010-09-27

State v. John E. Kehler
evidence in the record to support that finding, we accept the trial court's findings that Kehler did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10592 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, [they were] charge[s] that could be expunged from her record given her age.”5 The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09