Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45071 - 45080 of 62401 for child support.

State v. Robert James Rogers
of an altercation after he left the table. Boatman’s testimony supported the implausible theory that Potter fell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12608 - 2005-03-31

Mary A. Vvalther v. American Family Insurance Company
that American Family knew that the law did not support its position. We disagree. The rationale stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6505 - 2005-03-31

County of Buffalo v. Thomas P. Schaefer
, the trial court correctly denied Schaefer’s motion to suppress the evidence supporting his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11374 - 2005-03-31

Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
) as the basis, but did not specify which paragraph of that subsection. The appellants’ brief in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
’ agreement and could impose the maximum penalties. An adequate factual basis supported the convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Scott J. Frey
if the suppression motion had been granted or that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4571 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jacqueline Farence
discovery requests for certain work order history records which might support her claim. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the potential issues to support the no-merit conclusion, and we need not address them further. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465858 - 2021-12-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel A. Lacosse
in support of the subpoena must, but did not, include expert testimony establishing the likely probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20447 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Darwin D. Hoye
of a dangerous weapon. He claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support a probable cause determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3653 - 2017-09-19