Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45091 - 45100 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 45091 - 45100 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Paul Wozniak
analysis he used in this case. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1995, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
analysis he used in this case. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1995, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. Id. See also State v. Shillcutt, 116 Wis. 2d 227, 236, 341 N.W.2d 716 (Ct. App. 1983), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30053 - 2007-08-21
of the case. Id. See also State v. Shillcutt, 116 Wis. 2d 227, 236, 341 N.W.2d 716 (Ct. App. 1983), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30053 - 2007-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 19, 1980, a jury found Wattleton guilty in case No. J-6809
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143028 - 2017-09-21
claims and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 19, 1980, a jury found Wattleton guilty in case No. J-6809
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2018 WI 42 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2529-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211556 - 2018-04-20
2018 WI 42 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2529-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211556 - 2018-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representative. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves conflicts of interest resulting from Rapp’s appointments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140833 - 2017-09-21
representative. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves conflicts of interest resulting from Rapp’s appointments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140833 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by our case law. “As Linville teaches, the test to determine whether an activity is recreational focuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83349 - 2012-06-04
by our case law. “As Linville teaches, the test to determine whether an activity is recreational focuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83349 - 2012-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The genesis of this case is a judgment in a prior lawsuit, National Civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The genesis of this case is a judgment in a prior lawsuit, National Civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dawn Kangas v. Virgil Perry
2000 WI App 234 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2096 - 2017-09-19
2000 WI App 234 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2096 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733380 - 2023-11-29
2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733380 - 2023-11-29
COURT OF APPEALS
d. remington, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.[1] This small claims case was initiated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93183 - 2013-02-25
d. remington, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.[1] This small claims case was initiated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93183 - 2013-02-25