Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 29821 for des.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 29821 for des.
State v. Romell Quin
is more appropriately reviewed under a de novo standard. The State contends that because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
is more appropriately reviewed under a de novo standard. The State contends that because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41678 - 2009-10-06
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41678 - 2009-10-06
[PDF]
Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
Hoyme in person, through a third person or in any way whatsoever. Brakken requested a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
Hoyme in person, through a third person or in any way whatsoever. Brakken requested a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The construction of a statute and its application to undisputed facts are questions of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41970 - 2009-10-07
. “The construction of a statute and its application to undisputed facts are questions of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41970 - 2009-10-07
[PDF]
State v. James E. Szulczewski
are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10802 - 2017-09-20
are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10802 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶33, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. Erroneous Exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
reviews de novo. State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶33, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. Erroneous Exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
State v. Matthew D.
was applied, because it is this court’s function to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13399 - 2005-03-31
was applied, because it is this court’s function to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
forth below. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052069 - 2025-12-17
forth below. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052069 - 2025-12-17