Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 29923 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶14 If, on the other hand, the postconviction motion “does not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347515 - 2021-03-23

COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court to the constitutional standard; this presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41686 - 2009-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
forth below. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052069 - 2025-12-17

[PDF] WI App 49
involves the construction of an insurance contract, which we review de novo.” The Farmers Auto. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168702 - 2017-09-21

Certification
Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP, Voces De La Frontera, Ricky T. Lewis, Jennifer T. Platt, John J. Wolfe
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80190 - 2012-03-27

[PDF] State v. Trenton McAdoo
such allegations presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. [I]f the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13311 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Connie Schult v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8072 - 2017-09-19

David Gloss v. Legend Lake Property Owners Association, Inc.
motion presents a question of law that we review de novo. Schmitz v. Firstar Bank, 2002 WI App 123, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5952 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
offense that is supported by the evidence.” Id., ¶32. We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418069 - 2021-08-31

Johnny Larry v. David H. Schwarz
this court decides de novo, benefiting from the administrative agency's analysis. See State ex rel. Parker v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10253 - 2005-03-31