Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 4777 for ft.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 4777 for ft.
[PDF]
Marvin Herman v. County of Walworth
” with the handwritten notation “100 FT. = minimum width under R-2.” We note that the Town’s ordinance addresses lake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18949 - 2017-09-21
” with the handwritten notation “100 FT. = minimum width under R-2.” We note that the Town’s ordinance addresses lake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18949 - 2017-09-21
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
, No. 99-2683-FT, unpublished slip. op. ¶10 (Wis. Ct. App. Apr. 19, 2000). The record contains a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
, No. 99-2683-FT, unpublished slip. op. ¶10 (Wis. Ct. App. Apr. 19, 2000). The record contains a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the following question: “Are we considering the whole 66 ft. as the roadway?” In answer, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206004 - 2017-12-21
the following question: “Are we considering the whole 66 ft. as the roadway?” In answer, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206004 - 2017-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2008AP526-FT Cir. Ct. No. 2006JV13 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
. Appeal No. 2008AP526-FT Cir. Ct. No. 2006JV13 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
him to support Maureen beyond her marital standard of living. See Francis v. Francis, No. 99-2683-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7565 - 2017-09-19
him to support Maureen beyond her marital standard of living. See Francis v. Francis, No. 99-2683-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7565 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2014AP2971-FT Cir. Ct. No. 2013CV266 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141770 - 2015-05-18
. Appeal No. 2014AP2971-FT Cir. Ct. No. 2013CV266 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141770 - 2015-05-18
Karen J. Miemietz v. George J. Miemietz
. Appeal No. 03-0892-FT Cir. Ct. No. 97-FA-35 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 03-0892-FT Cir. Ct. No. 97-FA-35 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31
Franklin J. Smith v. Phillips Getschow Co.
. No. 99-2711-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16117 - 2005-03-31
. No. 99-2711-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
02/12/2025 Unpub. 2025AP813-FT Racine County v. R. P. L. Did the court of appeals apply
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1057534 - 2025-12-29
02/12/2025 Unpub. 2025AP813-FT Racine County v. R. P. L. Did the court of appeals apply
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1057534 - 2025-12-29
Randall G. Weber v. Mary Beth Weber
N.W.2d 102 (Wis. Mar. 13, 2003) (No. 02-1961-FT), we explained that all divorce stipulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6008 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 102 (Wis. Mar. 13, 2003) (No. 02-1961-FT), we explained that all divorce stipulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6008 - 2005-03-31