Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 50071 for our.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 50071 for our.
State v. Lawrence R. Illingworth, Sr.
Consent Law. After analyzing the Neville decision, our supreme court held that the United States Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15163 - 2005-03-31
Consent Law. After analyzing the Neville decision, our supreme court held that the United States Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698437 - 2023-09-06
merit. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698437 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559441 - 2022-08-30
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559441 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
should be allowed to withdraw his plea because it was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746561 - 2024-01-03
should be allowed to withdraw his plea because it was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746561 - 2024-01-03
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Hoyt
to elaborate on that instruction when the jury sought further assistance. However, our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8116 - 2017-09-19
to elaborate on that instruction when the jury sought further assistance. However, our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065734 - 2026-01-21
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065734 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157224 - 2017-09-21
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
himself at the plea hearing and sentencing hearing. Our review of the record shows that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
himself at the plea hearing and sentencing hearing. Our review of the record shows that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
State v. George Garcia
.”). Finally, Garcia argues that this court should modify his sentences to run concurrently, using our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9194 - 2005-03-31
.”). Finally, Garcia argues that this court should modify his sentences to run concurrently, using our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
himself at the plea hearing and sentencing hearing. Our review of the record shows that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
himself at the plea hearing and sentencing hearing. Our review of the record shows that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21