Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 63530 for records.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 63530 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the video was provided in court; no transcript of the video was in the record. Trial counsel confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324724 - 2021-01-20
of the video was provided in court; no transcript of the video was in the record. Trial counsel confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324724 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the time of the defendant’s trial was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70478 - 2014-09-15
at the time of the defendant’s trial was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70478 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically requested. Recording of voir dire did not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically requested. Recording of voir dire did not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
CA Blank Order
, counsel’s supplemental no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
, counsel’s supplemental no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As explained below, we limit our discussion to whether the record supports the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262804 - 2020-06-02
. As explained below, we limit our discussion to whether the record supports the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262804 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney’s failure to object at trial to the admission of a video recording of a forensic interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399050 - 2021-07-28
attorney’s failure to object at trial to the admission of a video recording of a forensic interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399050 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 merit report. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Howell’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
2 merit report. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Howell’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
Melvin R. Smith, Jr. v. Linda A. Smith
the trial court’s No. 03-2335 2 determination.1 Because the record demonstrates the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6826 - 2017-09-20
the trial court’s No. 03-2335 2 determination.1 Because the record demonstrates the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6826 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not respond. This court has considered the no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
not respond. This court has considered the no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
was necessary because the No. 98-2718-CR 2 record failed to sufficiently establish the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
was necessary because the No. 98-2718-CR 2 record failed to sufficiently establish the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21