Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4511 - 4520 of 58312 for speedy trial.

State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. John McClellan
for review: (1) whether the trial court erred when it denied his request to compel production of documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carol A. Hayes
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25309 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brown County Department of Health & Social Services v. Samantha E.
that her trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object to a jury instruction containing the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12180 - 2017-09-21

State v. Carol A. Hayes
. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25309 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] State v. Johnny Rainey
assistance of trial and postconviction counsel without holding an evidentiary hearing. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26293 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kathryn L. Edgette v. Daniel Kalscheuer
. Because we conclude that Attorney Mich’s position on the issue was not frivolous, and the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15103 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bobby Joe Smith
. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over Smith when it convicted him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8295 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
proceeded to a jury trial, where the jury viewed a thirty-eight-minute forensic video interview of N.F
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603905 - 2022-12-28

State v. Jeremy M. F.
the trial court's finding him guilty of having sexual contact with a child under the age of thirteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12344 - 2005-03-31