Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45121 - 45130 of 84355 for case number.
Search results 45121 - 45130 of 84355 for case number.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. However, even under § 972.15(1m), the decision to order a PSI is discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169799 - 2017-09-21
in this case. However, even under § 972.15(1m), the decision to order a PSI is discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169799 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. O’Keefe also contends that this court should remand this case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
was ineffective. O’Keefe also contends that this court should remand this case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for an award of attorneys’ fees in this case. This court agrees that Ossoinik’s claim for attorneys’ fees must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09
for an award of attorneys’ fees in this case. This court agrees that Ossoinik’s claim for attorneys’ fees must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
Denise Scheberle v. Bertram Milson, M.D.
a deviation from the applicable standard of care. Further, it concluded that “the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5633 - 2017-09-19
a deviation from the applicable standard of care. Further, it concluded that “the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5633 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
tests. This case presents a close call. However, based on persuasive authority in the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111914 - 2017-09-21
tests. This case presents a close call. However, based on persuasive authority in the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
questions about his employment and asked whether he thought he could be fair and impartial in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106834 - 2017-09-21
questions about his employment and asked whether he thought he could be fair and impartial in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106834 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonothan Gils
: 1) the trial judge did not have jurisdiction over his case; 2) the evidence presented by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2170 - 2005-03-31
: 1) the trial judge did not have jurisdiction over his case; 2) the evidence presented by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
demanded a jury trial. After jury selection, the parties resolved the case with a plea bargain. Lobley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39848 - 2014-09-15
demanded a jury trial. After jury selection, the parties resolved the case with a plea bargain. Lobley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39848 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The defendant in this case is charged with repeated acts of sexual assault of a child. Among the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99987 - 2013-07-29
. The defendant in this case is charged with repeated acts of sexual assault of a child. Among the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99987 - 2013-07-29
James R. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0086
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13509 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0086
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13509 - 2005-03-31