Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45121 - 45130 of 62363 for child support.
Search results 45121 - 45130 of 62363 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Darwin D. Hoye
of a dangerous weapon. He claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support a probable cause determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3653 - 2017-09-19
of a dangerous weapon. He claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support a probable cause determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3653 - 2017-09-19
Mary A. Vvalther v. American Family Insurance Company
that American Family knew that the law did not support its position. We disagree. The rationale stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6505 - 2005-03-31
that American Family knew that the law did not support its position. We disagree. The rationale stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6505 - 2005-03-31
County of Buffalo v. Thomas P. Schaefer
, the trial court correctly denied Schaefer’s motion to suppress the evidence supporting his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11374 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court correctly denied Schaefer’s motion to suppress the evidence supporting his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11374 - 2005-03-31
Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
) as the basis, but did not specify which paragraph of that subsection. The appellants’ brief in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
) as the basis, but did not specify which paragraph of that subsection. The appellants’ brief in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. We affirm the verdict unless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174512 - 2017-09-21
whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. We affirm the verdict unless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174512 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
committed other burglaries is not supported by anything in the record, and contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60271 - 2014-09-15
committed other burglaries is not supported by anything in the record, and contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60271 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert James Rogers
of an altercation after he left the table. Boatman’s testimony supported the implausible theory that Potter fell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12608 - 2005-03-31
of an altercation after he left the table. Boatman’s testimony supported the implausible theory that Potter fell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12608 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] The examiner’s report did not support a NGI defense.
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113991 - 2014-06-10
are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] The examiner’s report did not support a NGI defense.
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113991 - 2014-06-10
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
correctly excluded them. There was, therefore, no evidence supporting Lockett's claim of newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
correctly excluded them. There was, therefore, no evidence supporting Lockett's claim of newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
Cheri S. v. Crystal C.
conclude that this reading supports the objectives of the Juvenile Justice Code: “to … equip juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13331 - 2005-03-31
conclude that this reading supports the objectives of the Juvenile Justice Code: “to … equip juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13331 - 2005-03-31