Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45181 - 45190 of 76923 for judgment for u s.
Search results 45181 - 45190 of 76923 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
WI 46
of administrative oversight shall be paid from the appropriation provided in s. 20.680 (3) (h), 1997 stats
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032588 - 2025-10-30
of administrative oversight shall be paid from the appropriation provided in s. 20.680 (3) (h), 1997 stats
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032588 - 2025-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the circuit court’s competency. See Milwaukee County v. Edward S., 2001 WI App 169, ¶¶5-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105606 - 2017-09-21
to a challenge to the circuit court’s competency. See Milwaukee County v. Edward S., 2001 WI App 169, ¶¶5-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105606 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
. This section does not apply to proceedings under s. 48.21 or 48.213. [3] Wisconsin Stat. § 48.422(5) reads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
. This section does not apply to proceedings under s. 48.21 or 48.213. [3] Wisconsin Stat. § 48.422(5) reads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the case on for trial within 120 days after receipt of the request subject to s. 971.10. …. (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
the case on for trial within 120 days after receipt of the request subject to s. 971.10. …. (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
State v. Stanley Montelius
cause therefor, the court may order that the defendant be allowed to inspect and test under s. 804.09
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5133 - 2005-03-31
cause therefor, the court may order that the defendant be allowed to inspect and test under s. 804.09
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5133 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allan N.
for the child." Ann M.M. v. Rob S., 176 Wis.2d 673, 683-84, 500 N.W.2d 649, 654 (1993).[6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
for the child." Ann M.M. v. Rob S., 176 Wis.2d 673, 683-84, 500 N.W.2d 649, 654 (1993).[6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger F. Lewis
be counted under s. 343.307(1) .... [Emphasis added.] Because the Informing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9990 - 2005-03-31
be counted under s. 343.307(1) .... [Emphasis added.] Because the Informing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
never identified the person or persons who shot into Luckett, Sr.’s home, and the statements made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15
never identified the person or persons who shot into Luckett, Sr.’s home, and the statements made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not prejudicial because if “the defendant decided not to sign this stipulation, the [S]tate would have called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70527 - 2011-09-06
not prejudicial because if “the defendant decided not to sign this stipulation, the [S]tate would have called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70527 - 2011-09-06
Steven J. McConnell-Luer v. Gary R. McCaughtry
: This section is broader in scope than the criminal statute, s. 943.38(1) and (2), Stats., since the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8652 - 2005-03-31
: This section is broader in scope than the criminal statute, s. 943.38(1) and (2), Stats., since the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8652 - 2005-03-31