Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4521 - 4530 of 16438 for commentating.
Search results 4521 - 4530 of 16438 for commentating.
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Irish
comment to § 948.07, STATS., provides as follows: Comments—1987 Act 332 This section: No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
comment to § 948.07, STATS., provides as follows: Comments—1987 Act 332 This section: No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
State v. Trederick Nelson
erred in admitting hearsay evidence by commenting upon the facial expressions and gestures of Nelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
erred in admitting hearsay evidence by commenting upon the facial expressions and gestures of Nelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. M.
to comment upon another witness’s credibility. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has explained, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
to comment upon another witness’s credibility. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has explained, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. In Dillard’s view, by making these comments the prosecutor improperly vouched for the officer’s credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33744 - 2008-08-13
. In Dillard’s view, by making these comments the prosecutor improperly vouched for the officer’s credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33744 - 2008-08-13
State v. Lee Andrew Knowlin, Jr.
father’s employment; and (4) making inaccurate and damaging comments about the evidence in closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5423 - 2005-03-31
father’s employment; and (4) making inaccurate and damaging comments about the evidence in closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5423 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
placement or visitation. In granting the County’s motion, the circuit court perceptively commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
placement or visitation. In granting the County’s motion, the circuit court perceptively commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
of Correction. Huertas argues that the trial court’s sentencing comments reveal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21565 - 2017-09-21
of Correction. Huertas argues that the trial court’s sentencing comments reveal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21565 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph E. Heifort
, now uses “intimate part,” rather than “genitals or pubic area.” The Comment to the instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31
, now uses “intimate part,” rather than “genitals or pubic area.” The Comment to the instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“stopped.” As for the subsequent comments, Henry asserts that the detective “elicited the questioning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154142 - 2017-09-21
“stopped.” As for the subsequent comments, Henry asserts that the detective “elicited the questioning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154142 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roger H. Splitt
, Splitt, represented by new counsel, moved for a mistrial based on certain comments made by the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3073 - 2005-03-31
, Splitt, represented by new counsel, moved for a mistrial based on certain comments made by the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3073 - 2005-03-31