Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4521 - 4530 of 50086 for our.
Search results 4521 - 4530 of 50086 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
76. Our review of the record confirms that the trial court thoroughly considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762364 - 2024-02-13
76. Our review of the record confirms that the trial court thoroughly considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762364 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
76. Our review of the record confirms that the trial court thoroughly considered the relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762364 - 2024-02-13
76. Our review of the record confirms that the trial court thoroughly considered the relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762364 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157224 - 2017-09-21
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
its sentencing discretion. With regard to Mason’s guilty plea, our review of the record—including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
its sentencing discretion. With regard to Mason’s guilty plea, our review of the record—including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
OF REVIEW When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence we will not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
OF REVIEW When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence we will not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his underlying conviction and the sentence imposed. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724503 - 2023-11-07
his underlying conviction and the sentence imposed. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724503 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817415 - 2024-06-26
. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817415 - 2024-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106265 - 2017-09-21
of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106265 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
evidence to support the guilty verdicts. As stated in the report, our standard of review to determine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91509 - 2013-01-15
evidence to support the guilty verdicts. As stated in the report, our standard of review to determine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91509 - 2013-01-15