Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45241 - 45250 of 69002 for had.

State v. David J. Pettit
. McKee had considered information from Pettit’s presentence investigation report, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4596 - 2005-03-31

Edward A. Faas v. Ervin H. Nuttelman, Jr.
of access less disruptive to the Nuttlemans’ farming operation had been used seasonally since the mid-1980’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5137 - 2005-03-31

City of Greendale v. Paula A. Washow
was that dismissal of a criminal case had “broader implications for society as a whole” than does the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9833 - 2005-03-31

Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
that, although Moore had paid more than the guidelines required, the “overpayment” had been offset by Wathen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15723 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas J. McManus
that counsel had reason to believe McManus actually suffered comprehension problems at sentencing, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4429 - 2005-03-31

Lawrence McCoy v. David Schwarz
considered alternatives, but rejected them because McCoy had problems with supervision, he did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18194 - 2005-05-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and testified at length regarding changes in circumstances since the last time he and Searing had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144487 - 2017-09-21

American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Darlene M. Tadych
of money which [American Family] paid to its insured after its insured had negotiated and executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15586 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Susan M. Suhr v. Allstate Insurance Company
had taken the truck to college and had no restrictions placed upon its use. Restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7389 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
because when he was charged with forgery-uttering under Wis. Stat. § 943.38(2) (2001-02)[1] the crime had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08