Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45251 - 45260 of 57607 for id.
Search results 45251 - 45260 of 57607 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suspicion” standard. See id., ¶17. Carr argues that the information relayed by the unknown caller from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698543 - 2023-09-06
suspicion” standard. See id., ¶17. Carr argues that the information relayed by the unknown caller from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698543 - 2023-09-06
State v. Justen L. Carter
and “some adequate reason for [his] change of heart … other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. at ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26298 - 2006-08-28
and “some adequate reason for [his] change of heart … other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. at ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26298 - 2006-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
as the trial court, and we independently decide whether to uphold the agency decision. Id. at 385-86. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
as the trial court, and we independently decide whether to uphold the agency decision. Id. at 385-86. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a matter of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶25. Williams argues that his current income is zero
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914079 - 2025-02-19
is a matter of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶25. Williams argues that his current income is zero
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914079 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be raised in the circuit court No. 2016AP1195-CRNM 3 by a postconviction motion. 2 See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213134 - 2018-05-18
be raised in the circuit court No. 2016AP1195-CRNM 3 by a postconviction motion. 2 See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213134 - 2018-05-18
CA Blank Order
the protection of the public, punishment and rehabilitation of the defendant, and deterrence, id., ¶40
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93152 - 2013-02-26
the protection of the public, punishment and rehabilitation of the defendant, and deterrence, id., ¶40
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93152 - 2013-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be concurrent. No. 2019AP1353-CRNM 3 found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 501. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338262 - 2021-02-24
to be concurrent. No. 2019AP1353-CRNM 3 found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 501. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338262 - 2021-02-24
State v. Patrick C. Webster
that the defendant is in fact a repeater. Id. at 619-20, 350 N.W.2d at 637. The trial court did so here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
that the defendant is in fact a repeater. Id. at 619-20, 350 N.W.2d at 637. The trial court did so here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or subsequent to the original imposition of sentence[.]’” Id. at 14 (quoted source omitted and alteration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163067 - 2017-09-21
or subsequent to the original imposition of sentence[.]’” Id. at 14 (quoted source omitted and alteration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163067 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terrance A. Hood
standard of reasonably competent professional judgment. Id. at 636-37. To show prejudice, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3323 - 2005-03-31
standard of reasonably competent professional judgment. Id. at 636-37. To show prejudice, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3323 - 2005-03-31