Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4531 - 4540 of 64825 for records.
Search results 4531 - 4540 of 64825 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
appellate attorney and error by this court in our review of the record during the no-merit process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30255 - 2007-09-17
appellate attorney and error by this court in our review of the record during the no-merit process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30255 - 2007-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was never entered into evidence at any proceeding, the contract is not part of the record on appeal, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58975 - 2011-08-21
was never entered into evidence at any proceeding, the contract is not part of the record on appeal, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58975 - 2011-08-21
State v. Raymond Sykes, Jr.
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brief Cover
§ 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised
/formdisplay/CA-150.pdf?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30
§ 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised
/formdisplay/CA-150.pdf?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Cook
and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10362 - 2017-09-20
and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10362 - 2017-09-20
[MS WORD]
CA-150: Brief Cover
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Michael Davis
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19
State v. La'Shone Jackson
by an investigator, and did not explain why the information was not developed earlier. Based on this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2941 - 2005-03-31
by an investigator, and did not explain why the information was not developed earlier. Based on this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Harold Larson v. Forest Hill Memorial Park
apologized on the record, determined that the Estate's failure to adduce expert testimony that the marker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10922 - 2017-09-20
apologized on the record, determined that the Estate's failure to adduce expert testimony that the marker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10922 - 2017-09-20