Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45301 - 45310 of 61984 for child support.
Search results 45301 - 45310 of 61984 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Mark Joseph Kovach
On appeal, the State argues there was no evidence to support the court’s rejection of the breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25460 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, the State argues there was no evidence to support the court’s rejection of the breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25460 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward A. Stoetzel
of Officer Kim Gaffney in support of the search warrant in this case stated in relevant part: Affiant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31
of Officer Kim Gaffney in support of the search warrant in this case stated in relevant part: Affiant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the trial court order, we need not discuss other grounds). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34713 - 2008-11-25
to support the trial court order, we need not discuss other grounds). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34713 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Thompson
was recorded and would support its position, the State should have presented the transcript to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7326 - 2017-09-20
was recorded and would support its position, the State should have presented the transcript to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7326 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Lynette K. Felber
witness. In support of the motion, she submitted an affidavit pointing out inaccurate information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9433 - 2017-09-19
witness. In support of the motion, she submitted an affidavit pointing out inaccurate information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9433 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the evidence to support grounds for termination, a directed verdict on one of the special verdict questions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635314 - 2023-03-21
of the evidence to support grounds for termination, a directed verdict on one of the special verdict questions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635314 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21. 2 Wold does not support his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. RULE 809.21. 2 Wold does not support his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an adequate discussion of the potential issues to support the no-merit conclusion, and we need not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448250 - 2021-11-02
an adequate discussion of the potential issues to support the no-merit conclusion, and we need not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448250 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“waives” the argument she made in support of her motion to quash. The custodian further states that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326379 - 2021-01-21
“waives” the argument she made in support of her motion to quash. The custodian further states that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326379 - 2021-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not need to restate the reasons supporting the original sentencing. Id., ¶9. We “consider the original
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180604 - 2017-09-21
not need to restate the reasons supporting the original sentencing. Id., ¶9. We “consider the original
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180604 - 2017-09-21