Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45351 - 45360 of 83900 for case number.
Search results 45351 - 45360 of 83900 for case number.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95064 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95064 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212047 - 2018-04-26
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212047 - 2018-04-26
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis L. Farr
judges, both in his underlying prosecution and in this case. To the extent he is alleging bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
judges, both in his underlying prosecution and in this case. To the extent he is alleging bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward J. Thompson
test required by the implied consent law. He argues that the officer in this case exceeded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13532 - 2005-03-31
test required by the implied consent law. He argues that the officer in this case exceeded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13532 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
properly excluded the evidence and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 The victim in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82611 - 2012-05-16
properly excluded the evidence and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 The victim in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82611 - 2012-05-16
State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
, 324 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1982). Balli urges us to review the case on the merits, explaining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3181 - 2005-03-31
, 324 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1982). Balli urges us to review the case on the merits, explaining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3181 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in Kenosha County case no. 18CF139 with one count of second- degree sexual assault for having nonconsensual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245861 - 2019-09-04
in Kenosha County case no. 18CF139 with one count of second- degree sexual assault for having nonconsensual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245861 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172172 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
___, 725 N.W.2d 930. The trial court’s decision in this case rests on two errors of law. First, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28570 - 2014-09-15
___, 725 N.W.2d 930. The trial court’s decision in this case rests on two errors of law. First, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28570 - 2014-09-15