Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45361 - 45370 of 69122 for j o e y.
Search results 45361 - 45370 of 69122 for j o e y.
[PDF]
State v. Renee L. Reek
STAT. § 973.15(1) provides in part, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, all sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
STAT. § 973.15(1) provides in part, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, all sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
20, 2007, provided that “[e]ach party shall have the use of the items of personal property in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45677 - 2014-09-15
20, 2007, provided that “[e]ach party shall have the use of the items of personal property in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45677 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7657 - 2017-09-19
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7657 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. (d) The desirability that the custodian remain in the home as a full-time parent. (e) The cost of day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35309 - 2009-01-27
. (d) The desirability that the custodian remain in the home as a full-time parent. (e) The cost of day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35309 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from judgments of the circuit court for Dane County: WILLIAM E. HANRAHAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21
from judgments of the circuit court for Dane County: WILLIAM E. HANRAHAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36146 - 2014-09-15
County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36146 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Aretus S. Fenn
or a misuse of discretion. See id. “[W]e will uphold the court’s determination that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
or a misuse of discretion. See id. “[W]e will uphold the court’s determination that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the date of the recording has no [e]ffect on the validity of the assignee’s interest.” ¶18 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
, and the date of the recording has no [e]ffect on the validity of the assignee’s interest.” ¶18 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 943.32(1)(b); WIS. STAT. § 939.32(1g); WIS. STAT. § 939.50(3)(e) (2019-20).3 ¶8 Carter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467052 - 2021-12-28
. STAT. § 943.32(1)(b); WIS. STAT. § 939.32(1g); WIS. STAT. § 939.50(3)(e) (2019-20).3 ¶8 Carter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467052 - 2021-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to be persuasive or even plausible. Id., ¶31. “[E]ven a ‘silly or superstitious’ reason, if facially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
to be persuasive or even plausible. Id., ¶31. “[E]ven a ‘silly or superstitious’ reason, if facially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03