Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45391 - 45400 of 59018 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10764 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
on this claim is affirmed. No(s). 97-3431-FT 4 By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13310 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Reginald D. Moore
-0732-CR 00-1270-CR 2 modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2396 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
) the “new factor” that he recanted his trial testimony claiming innocence and now admits that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183443 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504946 - 2022-04-07

[PDF] State v. Regies Mundy
from now claiming sentence credit. Therefore, we affirm. No. 94-1291-CR -2- While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7882 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
been different.” This appeal follows. To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498469 - 2022-03-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentence modification and reconsideration motions. Jones raises a second issue claiming the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Diaz’s testimony that Pringle claims harmed him was not based on information contained in the DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87370 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP543-CRNM 3 and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478690 - 2022-02-03