Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4541 - 4550 of 68466 for did.
Search results 4541 - 4550 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the repeater enhancer portion of his sentence on the basis that he did not admit to and the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163073 - 2017-09-21
the repeater enhancer portion of his sentence on the basis that he did not admit to and the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163073 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in Wis. Stat. § 971.09[1] when it consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in Wis. Stat. § 971.09[1] when it consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Schiller
they did. The criminal complaint was filed on August 19, 1999, approximately twenty months after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2574 - 2017-09-19
they did. The criminal complaint was filed on August 19, 1999, approximately twenty months after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2574 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
revocation decision in December 1998. Celske did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15
revocation decision in December 1998. Celske did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
one, and that it did not have to wait for an incident to occur before granting a new injunction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66566 - 2011-06-28
one, and that it did not have to wait for an incident to occur before granting a new injunction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66566 - 2011-06-28
State v. Martwon Brown
to file a direct appeal. He also claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10
to file a direct appeal. He also claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
court did not err when it dismissed the charge for lack of probable cause, we affirm. ¶2 In January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31695 - 2014-09-15
court did not err when it dismissed the charge for lack of probable cause, we affirm. ¶2 In January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31695 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this argument must be raised as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because his trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38005 - 2014-09-15
that this argument must be raised as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because his trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38005 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
were not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently because he did not understand that a mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
were not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently because he did not understand that a mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
. Lee did not make a misrepresentation. Because the trial court did not err in rendering this finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
. Lee did not make a misrepresentation. Because the trial court did not err in rendering this finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31