Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4541 - 4550 of 12869 for se.

Rock County DHS v. Jessica L.
, 2004. ¶4 Jessica appeared pro se at the April 12th hearing. She stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20154 - 2005-11-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Precious M. Ward, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108920 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
se, appeals a judgment of $427.72 granted in favor of Marathon County. His brief also appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18370 - 2017-09-21

Randall Schwartz v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
with the Department objecting to the assessment. The Department rejected the petition and Schwartz, acting pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4926 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sylvester Townsend
., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J. Sylvester Townsend appeals, pro se, from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18515 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Russell O. Rose1 appeals pro se from two circuit court orders dismissing his Motions to Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048748 - 2025-12-10

State v. Sylvester Townsend
, pro se, from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. He raises seven issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18515 - 2005-06-13

[PDF] Rock County DHS v. Jessica L.
. ¶4 Jessica appeared pro se at the April 12th hearing. She stated that she wished to have counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20154 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Randall Schwartz v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
proceedings in this case. Following the circuit court proceedings, Schwartz, acting pro se, signed and filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4926 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
the special assessments, the front-foot method, was per se reasonable. The Genrichs appeal. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6233 - 2017-09-19