Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45411 - 45420 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 45411 - 45420 of 74812 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 30, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
records of the victim; (4) failing to prevent the State from introducing medical records at trial; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27293 - 2006-11-29
records of the victim; (4) failing to prevent the State from introducing medical records at trial; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27293 - 2006-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that your client would like to testify. We spoke briefly on the record about that yesterday. Just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108350 - 2017-09-21
that your client would like to testify. We spoke briefly on the record about that yesterday. Just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108350 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
the record reflects a reasonable exercise of discretion, we affirm the order. The underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19
the record reflects a reasonable exercise of discretion, we affirm the order. The underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Todd A. Murdock
portions of the trial transcript in the appellate record. The record is missing Horne’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15043 - 2017-09-21
portions of the trial transcript in the appellate record. The record is missing Horne’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). D.M.L. filed two responses.2 Based upon an independent review of the records, the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
). D.M.L. filed two responses.2 Based upon an independent review of the records, the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d at 68. Accordingly, we turn to the record to decide whether the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03
. 2d at 68. Accordingly, we turn to the record to decide whether the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03
State v. Bryan S. Campbell
not. Section 980.02(1)(b). ¶4 Campbell argues that there is no evidence in the record that the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
not. Section 980.02(1)(b). ¶4 Campbell argues that there is no evidence in the record that the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the motion without a hearing. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2015-05-18
the motion without a hearing. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2015-05-18
State v. Stephen S.
visits. Thus, Stephen contends that “[t]he record shows that during the period of alleged abandonment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
visits. Thus, Stephen contends that “[t]he record shows that during the period of alleged abandonment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 2d at 68. Accordingly, we turn to the record to decide whether the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26650 - 2014-09-15
. 2d at 68. Accordingly, we turn to the record to decide whether the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26650 - 2014-09-15