Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45451 - 45460 of 55745 for n y c.
Search results 45451 - 45460 of 55745 for n y c.
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
C. HOUCK, Judges. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
C. HOUCK, Judges. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Richmond
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John B. Beiswenger
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6341 - 2017-09-19
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6341 - 2017-09-19
Lynda D. Dahlke v. James D. Dahlke
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Patrick C. Haughney, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Patrick C. Haughney, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31
Paul Kelnhofer v. Village of Ephraim
that the applicant must provide and empowers the Village to seek "other requested information." Id. § 17.27(4)(c)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8163 - 2005-03-31
that the applicant must provide and empowers the Village to seek "other requested information." Id. § 17.27(4)(c)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8163 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the intent to use it. [Burns’] [c]ounsel’s inference that it is reasonable to assume that the Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186788 - 2017-09-21
with the intent to use it. [Burns’] [c]ounsel’s inference that it is reasonable to assume that the Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186788 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allowed by the statute. See WIS. STAT. § 813.125(4)(c). We affirmed the circuit court’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66566 - 2014-09-15
allowed by the statute. See WIS. STAT. § 813.125(4)(c). We affirmed the circuit court’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66566 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth Golden
: EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Deininger and Jones,[1] JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12905 - 2005-03-31
: EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Deininger and Jones,[1] JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12905 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 346.37(1)(c)1. (“[v]ehicular traffic facing a red signal shall stop”); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
. See Wis. Stat. § 346.37(1)(c)1. (“[v]ehicular traffic facing a red signal shall stop”); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16