Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45461 - 45470 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 45461 - 45470 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Mark J. Modory
) which he claims are maintained by the Department of Transportation for five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9438 - 2005-03-31
) which he claims are maintained by the Department of Transportation for five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
Larry Tiepelman v. Phil Kingston
a prison disciplinary decision against Larry Tiepelman. Kingston claims the order exceeded the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15736 - 2005-03-31
a prison disciplinary decision against Larry Tiepelman. Kingston claims the order exceeded the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15736 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91741 - 2013-01-14
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91741 - 2013-01-14
2007 WI APP 155
, privilege, or immunity afforded under Federal treaty….” He claims the right to hunt is protected by an 1856
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28876 - 2007-06-26
, privilege, or immunity afforded under Federal treaty….” He claims the right to hunt is protected by an 1856
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28876 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Debrow
argument concerning this claim, and the trial court therefore did not rule on it. We deem it waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13711 - 2014-09-15
argument concerning this claim, and the trial court therefore did not rule on it. We deem it waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13711 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. L.C. Whitehead, Jr.
alleged a prima facie claim for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26264 - 2017-09-21
alleged a prima facie claim for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ogden Development Group, Inc. v. Dolores M. Buchel
are “completely different.” The Board specifically claims that the current proposal is “much different” than
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11398 - 2017-09-19
are “completely different.” The Board specifically claims that the current proposal is “much different” than
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11398 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, is an inmate of a state prison; (2) whether there is any arguable merit to claim that the county failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132527 - 2017-09-21
, is an inmate of a state prison; (2) whether there is any arguable merit to claim that the county failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132527 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew R. Reynolds
testified that VerHagen and Reynolds inquired about the annuity that VerHagen claims he intended to purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8071 - 2005-03-31
testified that VerHagen and Reynolds inquired about the annuity that VerHagen claims he intended to purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8071 - 2005-03-31