Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45471 - 45480 of 82645 for case codes/1000.

State v. Brett M. Trenter
. BACKGROUND The facts relevant to this case are undisputed. On May 10, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Johnson Bank. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103368 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. 1997). We have thus “read the statute and [] case law to say that restitution is the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25

[PDF] County of Dane v. John W. Moore
Ordinance § 32.03. Moore argues that his conviction should be reversed or his case remanded for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5159 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. We conclude that this case is 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
-Naranjo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶20, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26865 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that to be the case.” The court also found that the alleged identity theft was irrelevant to the nonsupport charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165914 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96079 - 2014-09-15

Margricio Benitez v. William Fasick
than six months after the entry of judgment contrary to § 799.29(1)(c), Stats. Because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13362 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 2023AP002020 - 10-09-2024 Court Order
is dismissed; and FILED 10-09-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP002020 10-09-2024
/supreme/docs/23ap2020_1024order.pdf - 2024-10-09