Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45471 - 45480 of 83976 for simple case search.
Search results 45471 - 45480 of 83976 for simple case search.
Joseph Mattila v. Employe Trust Funds Board
2001 WI App 79 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2405 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 79 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2405 - 2005-03-31
William N. Ledford v. Circuit Court for Dane County
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0939-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15358 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0939-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15358 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a month after the charges were amended, new trial counsel was appointed for Jones. The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
a month after the charges were amended, new trial counsel was appointed for Jones. The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor relating to his sentence: in a separate case, Williams received a less severe sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241057 - 2019-05-23
factor relating to his sentence: in a separate case, Williams received a less severe sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241057 - 2019-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
This case arises from the closing of a real estate transaction from which Olson was to receive $175,968.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79258 - 2012-03-07
This case arises from the closing of a real estate transaction from which Olson was to receive $175,968.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79258 - 2012-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
initial decision. The ALJ’s decision applied case law defining “misconduct” and stated that, in deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28805 - 2007-04-25
initial decision. The ALJ’s decision applied case law defining “misconduct” and stated that, in deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28805 - 2007-04-25
State v. Bernard J. McCoy
to any party or to any attorney appearing in the case, or has any financial interest in the case”[2] from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3642 - 2005-03-31
to any party or to any attorney appearing in the case, or has any financial interest in the case”[2] from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3642 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger H. Leiskau
in the analysis is the requirement that the other acts evidence be relevant to an issue in the case. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2013-02-26
in the analysis is the requirement that the other acts evidence be relevant to an issue in the case. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2013-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were withdrawn, Monese said “certainly that will be the case,” pointing to two prior instances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599119 - 2022-12-14
were withdrawn, Monese said “certainly that will be the case,” pointing to two prior instances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599119 - 2022-12-14
James Szymczak v. Terrace at St. Francis
2006 WI App 3 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2067 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20810 - 2006-01-24
2006 WI App 3 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2067 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20810 - 2006-01-24