Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45471 - 45480 of 84324 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 45471 - 45480 of 84324 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 violated WIS. STAT. § 757.30 by filing documents in this case without a lawyer; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700129 - 2023-09-06
2 violated WIS. STAT. § 757.30 by filing documents in this case without a lawyer; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700129 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Miller “does not apply to [Hampton’s] case because a parole eligibility date was set in his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
that Miller “does not apply to [Hampton’s] case because a parole eligibility date was set in his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
David C. Kanz v. Catherine M. Doyle
served with Kanz's complaint in the instant case, Doyle filed a motion to dismiss on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10321 - 2005-03-31
served with Kanz's complaint in the instant case, Doyle filed a motion to dismiss on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10321 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12). Pursuant to our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95271 - 2013-04-16
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12). Pursuant to our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95271 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226523 - 2018-11-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226523 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Eric L. Gordon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218708 - 2018-09-12
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Eric L. Gordon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218708 - 2018-09-12
State v. William W. Gandt
observation period requires suppression of the test results. Moreover, applicable case law holds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
observation period requires suppression of the test results. Moreover, applicable case law holds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that Velez’s case could be denied for the same reasons we relied on in State v. Smith, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71349 - 2014-09-15
concluded that Velez’s case could be denied for the same reasons we relied on in State v. Smith, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71349 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark H.K.
applicable to both this case and another. Mark appeals that portion of the order addressing his criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
applicable to both this case and another. Mark appeals that portion of the order addressing his criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tyree Goodrich
and order. ¶2 In Brown County Circuit Court case no. 02-CF-676, the State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7316 - 2005-03-31
and order. ¶2 In Brown County Circuit Court case no. 02-CF-676, the State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7316 - 2005-03-31