Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45481 - 45490 of 62305 for child support.
Search results 45481 - 45490 of 62305 for child support.
State v. Walter J. Griffin
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-04-25
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Goldie H.
was made: without a hearing and without statutory findings to support the decision. ¶5 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2543 - 2017-09-19
was made: without a hearing and without statutory findings to support the decision. ¶5 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2543 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leroy Moore
. See id. at 4‑5. We explained the record support for the trial court’s imposition of a lengthier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25070 - 2006-05-08
. See id. at 4‑5. We explained the record support for the trial court’s imposition of a lengthier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25070 - 2006-05-08
CA Blank Order
.2d 320 (1983), in support of its assertion that issues not considered by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
.2d 320 (1983), in support of its assertion that issues not considered by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factual basis supporting the conviction. Although not discussed in the no-merit report, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194383 - 2017-09-21
factual basis supporting the conviction. Although not discussed in the no-merit report, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194383 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the firearm restriction. He argues that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241799 - 2019-06-05
argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the firearm restriction. He argues that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241799 - 2019-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 1486. Padilla does not provide support for Taylor’s argument that his attorney performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84849 - 2014-09-15
, 1486. Padilla does not provide support for Taylor’s argument that his attorney performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the judge does not need to restate the reasons supporting the original sentencing. Id., ¶9. We “consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149694 - 2017-09-21
, the judge does not need to restate the reasons supporting the original sentencing. Id., ¶9. We “consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is this argument inadequately developed, it finds no support in the Record. The Record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58293 - 2014-09-15
is this argument inadequately developed, it finds no support in the Record. The Record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58293 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dorothy Coello v. Allstate Insurance Company
241 (1977), to support their argument that an issue of fact remains on the issue of restricted use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12712 - 2017-09-21
241 (1977), to support their argument that an issue of fact remains on the issue of restricted use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12712 - 2017-09-21