Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4551 - 4560 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Eric T. Scott
. ¶5 Scott filed postconviction motions to modify his sentence in the circuit court, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17891 - 2005-05-02

State v. Eric T. Scott
. ¶5 Scott filed postconviction motions to modify his sentence in the circuit court, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17895 - 2005-05-02

[PDF] Christopher H. Kartes v. Jane M. Kartes
that the legislature places value on the child care services performed by a custodial parent, recognizing the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18813 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Popke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107406 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Popke argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
Bradley. The court discussed the motion. It failed on a vote of 5:2 (Chief Justice Patience Drake
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192530 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
Bradley. The court discussed the motion. It failed on a vote of 5:2 (Chief Justice Patience Drake
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192530 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 66
interests will be served by being in [the Roseckys'] legal custody and physical placement," and that "[t
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99308 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
," that the "Child's best interests will be served by being in [the Roseckys'] legal custody and physical placement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99308 - 2013-07-10

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
unauthorized use of the forklift. After oral arguments, the circuit court granted Partners’ motion, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27201 - 2006-11-21