Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4551 - 4560 of 29916 for des.

[PDF] NOTICE
, no new contract.” II. ¶8 We review de novo a trial court’s grant of summary judgment. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29256 - 2014-09-15

National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
not expressly address this issue, our review would necessarily be de novo. For purposes of this appeal, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12368 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Romell Quin
that this case is more appropriately reviewed under a de novo standard. The State contends that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13962 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Johnson Litho Graphics of Eau Claire, Ltd. v. Sarver, 2012 WI App 107, ¶6, 344 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=799641 - 2024-05-15

COURT OF APPEALS
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41678 - 2009-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
right is a constitutional issue that we review de novo. See Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160761 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
below. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697276 - 2023-08-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.1 Samuel R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96839 - 2014-09-15

Malvern Sullivan v. Waukesha County
functions de novo, as Sullivan would have us do. ¶8 We conclude that the court’s findings on remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15812 - 2005-03-31

WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1940 Complete Title of...
of law reviewed de novo. Atkins v. Swimwest Family Fitness Ctr., 2005 WI 4, ¶11, 277 Wis. 2d 303, 691
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95981 - 2014-03-09