Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45571 - 45580 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 45571 - 45580 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95064 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95064 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shawano County v. Bermuda H.
ninety-six hours of the final hearing. The two cases she cites both deal with failure to hold final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15842 - 2017-09-21
ninety-six hours of the final hearing. The two cases she cites both deal with failure to hold final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15842 - 2017-09-21
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
court. We decline to decide the case on this ground because the “mail-box” rule may potentially apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
court. We decline to decide the case on this ground because the “mail-box” rule may potentially apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis L. Farr
judges, both in his underlying prosecution and in this case. To the extent he is alleging bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
judges, both in his underlying prosecution and in this case. To the extent he is alleging bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of these offenses in Milwaukee County. He points to various cases over the last thirty years in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66704 - 2011-06-27
of these offenses in Milwaukee County. He points to various cases over the last thirty years in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66704 - 2011-06-27
Frontsheet
2008 WI 39 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP1239-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32656 - 2008-05-08
2008 WI 39 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP1239-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32656 - 2008-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
___, 725 N.W.2d 930. The trial court’s decision in this case rests on two errors of law. First, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28570 - 2014-09-15
___, 725 N.W.2d 930. The trial court’s decision in this case rests on two errors of law. First, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28570 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212047 - 2018-04-26
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212047 - 2018-04-26