Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45581 - 45590 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 45581 - 45590 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
CA Blank Order
Circuit Court case No. 2007CM3999, the State charged Krumrei with criminal damage to property. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92790 - 2013-02-11
Circuit Court case No. 2007CM3999, the State charged Krumrei with criminal damage to property. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92790 - 2013-02-11
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
they waived the preliminary hearing in several felony cases, failed to file motions for discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
they waived the preliminary hearing in several felony cases, failed to file motions for discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
robbery, until his resentencing in the instant case on February 23, 2017. Finally, on December 19, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416785 - 2021-08-31
robbery, until his resentencing in the instant case on February 23, 2017. Finally, on December 19, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416785 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
AP-012: Petition for Waiver of Fees/Costs, Affidavit of Indigency; Allegation of Imminent Danger
of Imminent Danger Case No. Under oath I state that: • I am unable to prepay
/formdisplay/AP-012.pdf?formNumber=AP-012&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2012-04-16
of Imminent Danger Case No. Under oath I state that: • I am unable to prepay
/formdisplay/AP-012.pdf?formNumber=AP-012&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2012-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Clifton L. Watts
endangering safety, contrary to § 941.30(1), STATS. The prosecution’s theory of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10487 - 2017-09-20
endangering safety, contrary to § 941.30(1), STATS. The prosecution’s theory of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10487 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attachment, and the answer, it appears that the [small claims] case involves claims that have been brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21
attachment, and the answer, it appears that the [small claims] case involves claims that have been brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the State resolving this case and a related possession-of-child-pornography case, which also involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
with the State resolving this case and a related possession-of-child-pornography case, which also involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.1 We affirm. On April 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.1 We affirm. On April 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
An admission of the alleged grounds in a termination of parental rights case must be made “with understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
An admission of the alleged grounds in a termination of parental rights case must be made “with understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sukhbinder Singh
for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm. I. ¶2 This case arises out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4266 - 2005-03-31
for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm. I. ¶2 This case arises out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4266 - 2005-03-31