Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45591 - 45600 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
DeBauche’s argument that he did not receive proper notice of a temporary injunction in the probate case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69374 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
the motion. This no-merit appeal follows. The only potential issue in this case concerns the issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106875 - 2014-01-21

COURT OF APPEALS
cases. Based on Streicher’s testimony about his knowledge about levels of window tint and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131706 - 2014-12-15

CA Blank Order
and the parties’ briefs, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119837 - 2014-08-18

COURT OF APPEALS
to file a timely petition for certiorari review of a revocation decision may in some cases be excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or drug abuse in this case. And I think the record here has clearly established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105006 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101975 - 2013-09-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Ronnie L. Thums appeals, pro se, from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709581 - 2023-10-04

State v. James D. Luedtke
motions to withdraw his plea and received hearings on both. In each case, Luedtke alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10779 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
2003 WI 130 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-0159-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16715 - 2005-03-31