Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 12554 for abuse.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 12554 for abuse.
CA Blank Order
offense, both as a repeater. The information also elevated the animal abuse charge to felony intentional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113555 - 2014-05-29
offense, both as a repeater. The information also elevated the animal abuse charge to felony intentional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113555 - 2014-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
count of attempted strangulation and suffocation (domestic abuse), as a repeater, and one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112474 - 2017-09-21
count of attempted strangulation and suffocation (domestic abuse), as a repeater, and one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112474 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald Kaltenbach
, resulting in substance abuse and revealing a dark side to his personality.[2] Consequently, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3020 - 2005-03-31
, resulting in substance abuse and revealing a dark side to his personality.[2] Consequently, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an “active imagination”; and he did not abuse other children for whom he babysat. A valid guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548476 - 2022-07-26
an “active imagination”; and he did not abuse other children for whom he babysat. A valid guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548476 - 2022-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Eventually, the Association believed the Hunts were abusing this privilege.2 In June 2010, the Association
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97758 - 2014-09-15
Eventually, the Association believed the Hunts were abusing this privilege.2 In June 2010, the Association
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97758 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court’s decisions to deny her motions to continue were “retaliatory in nature, rude and abusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03
that the court’s decisions to deny her motions to continue were “retaliatory in nature, rude and abusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
indeed made any admission that was binding, i.e., did the trial court abuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75243 - 2014-09-15
indeed made any admission that was binding, i.e., did the trial court abuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stephen S.
and the trial court's conclusion. Stephen next argues that “the trial court abused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
and the trial court's conclusion. Stephen next argues that “the trial court abused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
)(a), STATS., and violation of a domestic abuse injunction as a repeater contrary to §§ 813.12 and 939.62(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12175 - 2017-09-21
)(a), STATS., and violation of a domestic abuse injunction as a repeater contrary to §§ 813.12 and 939.62(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with intimidation of a witness and three counts of violation of a domestic abuse injunction. The State invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99700 - 2014-09-15
with intimidation of a witness and three counts of violation of a domestic abuse injunction. The State invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99700 - 2014-09-15