Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 29916 for des.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 29916 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4890 - 2017-09-19
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4890 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Estate of Harvey L. Tucker v. Forest County Potawatomi Community
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5677 - 2017-09-19
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5677 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
found Parsons guilty of all four offenses. Parsons timely filed a notice of de novo appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555803 - 2022-08-17
found Parsons guilty of all four offenses. Parsons timely filed a notice of de novo appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555803 - 2022-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
On appeal, we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141776 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141776 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sara L. Lohry
there was such probable cause and affirm. ¶2 This court reviews a probable cause determination de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6789 - 2005-03-31
there was such probable cause and affirm. ¶2 This court reviews a probable cause determination de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6789 - 2005-03-31
George A. Mudrovich v. Shar Soto
exclusive remedy provision is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Lentz v. Young, 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15580 - 2005-03-31
exclusive remedy provision is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Lentz v. Young, 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15580 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Clifton Hampton
the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial court granted. Hampton then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9084 - 2005-03-31
the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial court granted. Hampton then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶14 For that review of the relevant statutes at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578450 - 2022-10-19
de novo. See Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶14 For that review of the relevant statutes at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578450 - 2022-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Inglin, 224 Wis. 2d 764, 778, 592 N.W.2d 666 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867742 - 2024-10-29
that we review de novo. State v. Inglin, 224 Wis. 2d 764, 778, 592 N.W.2d 666 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867742 - 2024-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo the circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103505 - 2013-10-28
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo the circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103505 - 2013-10-28